Recognition of (Sesc) for Easy Identification of Staphylococcus Epidermidis and Molecular and Phenotypic Study of Β-Lactam Resistance in Staphylococcus Epidermidis Isolates in Isfahan

Background: Not only is it crucial to rapidly detect Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) isolates from a broad range of bacteria, but recognizing resistance agents can greatly improve current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Methods: The current cross-sectional study investigated 120 clinical isolates from a nosocomial S. epidermidis infection. The isolates were identified using common biochemical tests, and specific S. epidermidis surface protein C (SesC) primers were used to confirm the presence of S. epidermidis. PCR and special primers were used to detect the β-lactamase gene (blaZ). Methicillin resistance was measured using the agar screening method and antibiotic susceptibility was measured by disk diffusion. Results: 100 samples were characterized as S. epidermidis using a phenotypic and genotypic methods. From the 100 specimens examined, 80% contained blaZ. According to agar screening, 60% of isolates were methicillin-resistant. S. epidermidis isolates demonstrated the highest resistance to penicillin (93%) and the highest sensitivity to cefazolin (39%). Conclusions: The increased resistance to β-lactam antibiotics in S. epidermidis isolates is alarming, and certain precautions should be taken by healthcare systems to continuously monitor the antimicrobial pattern of S. epidermidis, so that an appropriate drug treatment can be established.


Introduction
It is important to identify bacteria in clinics and medical diagnostic laboratories to provide appropriate therapeutic solutions (1). In most laboratories across the country, the identification process of isolates is based on phenotype or experimental biochemical test (1,2).
Unfortunately, common biochemical tests are often Laborious and technical. The exact and definite diagnosis of isolates requires multiple tests that demand extensive preparation and isolated cultures (1). When the number of laboratory visits patients increases, it is practically impossible for everyone to provide and prepare media and other biochemistry tests, therefore, incomplete testing may occur. It actually reduces the required number of tests and the accuracy of identifying isolates by providing incorrect answers (1,2). The biofilm interconnectedness and densification of gram-positive bacteria under a microscope are more complex than gram-negative bacteria. So that recognition of these bacteria based on morphology and biochemistry test is hard and time-consuming, and also some tests for them such as PYR and fermentation of different sugars, are not possible in laboratories due to their high cost (1,2,5,18). Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) has Downloaded from rbmb.net at 23:02 +0430 on Tuesday September 7th 2021 become an important member of the coagulasenegative staphylococci (CNS) group within the last decade, is the third cause of nosocomial infections, and one of the most common causes of blood infections. S. epidermidis has been isolated from wound infections, skin infections, endocarditis, bacteremia, pneumonia, infected urinary tracts and soft tissue (1)(2)(3)(4). The most important factor in the success of S. epidermidis stems from its ability to produce biofilm on the catheter. Today, S. epidermidis surface proteins have been found in biofilms, including S. epidermidis surface protein C (SesC) and S. epidermidis surface protein I (SesI). The SesC gene is necessary for biofilm creation and encodes for SesC, which contains 676 amino acids (2,5). Anti-SesC antibodies are used to prevent the formation of biofilms caused by different strains of S. epidermidis, as these sequences are highly protected within this particular species (1,5). Today, SesC is used as a rapid identification marker for S. epidermidis from other isolates (2). β-lactam drugs are used to treat most S. epidermidis infections (6,7). Resistance to β-lactam antibiotics is commonly associated with staphylococci resistance. This can be observed in hospital pathogens such as CNS (6). In staphylococci, the main mechanism of resistance against β-lactam antibiotics is generally divided into two categories (6,8). The first category is characterized by the deactivation of penicillin by βlactam ring hydrolysis. The second category, mostly observed in humans, includes the production of β-lactamase enzymes and penicillinbinding proteins (PBPs), both of which reduce the response to medication and increases resistance to semi-synthetic penicillin, cephalosporins, and carbapenems (9). A study conducted on the β-lactamase gene (blaZ) showed that it has structural, suppressor and signal transducer sequences coded by different blaZ groups (10). Not only does the secretion of the βlactamase enzyme causes increased resistance to βlactam drugs, but at high concentrations, some non-methicillin-resistant gene strains may confer false resistance to methicillin (6, 10, 11). Methicillin-resistant isolates are created as a result of S. epidermidis conferring resistant genes, such as mecA. Often, this type of resistance leads to connects mecA gene or penicillin-binding protein (PBP2' or PBP2a). This protein is a transpeptidase that has low attraction ability for β-lactams (6,12). The resistance of the CNS group has been observed in both humans and animals (6,13). The identification of these pathogens is important to eliminate the development of hospital infections (6,14). The aim of this study was to detect SesC and blaZ in clinical specimens of S. epidermidis and determine resistance to methicillin and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of β-lactam drugs.

Sample collection and bacterial characterization
In a span of six months, from January to June 2019, 120 clinical samples were collected and examined. The identification of isolates was conducted using common biochemical tests. The isolates were stored in brain heart infusion (BHI) media and 15% glycerol at -20 °C.

Confirm of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates
To confirm the identity of strains, isolates were exposed to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the SesC gene. The genomic DNA of isolates was purified using a DNA extraction kit (CinnaGen, Iran) which was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol. Specific PCR primers used in this study can be found in Table 1. PCR was used to detect SesC which was previously described (2).

Polymerase chain reaction for detection of blaZ
PCR reaction was performed for detection of blaZ gene. DNA of the isolates were derived using DNA derivation kits according to the manufacturer's instructions (CinnaGen, Iran). The quality and quantity of DNA were determined using a spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Specific primer sequences were used to amplify blaZ ( Table 1). The PCR protocol of this study followed the protocol described by Zehra et al (15). The PCR mixture was performed in a total volume of 25 μl. Primer sets containing blaZ (1 μl of each primer of 20 pmol concentration) were added to the reaction volume. PCR cycling conditions included an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 45 s, followed by 30 cycles each of denaturation at 94 °C for 20 s, then, annealing at 55 °C for 15 s and extension at 70 °C for 15 s, followed by a final extension step at 72 °C for 2 mins (15). Amplicons were stored at 4 °C.

Discussion
Accurately identifying different strains of bacteria in laboratories has crucial implications in healthcare settings. The ability to rapidly recognize bacterial strains, while maintaining accuracy and simplicity, can improve current diagnostic approaches (2,17). In this study, the SesC gene was present in all S. epidermidis isolates. Therefore, the SesC gene can be used as a genetic marker to distinguish S. epidermidis from other isolates (2).  reported SesC as a genetic marker that can easily identify S. epidermidis, since all of the S. epidermidis isolates contained SesC. Furthermore, the results of this study were consistent with our study (5,18). Previous studies show that 60-85% of S. epidermidis isolates were methicillin-resistant in various geographical locations (12). Following an agar screen test, Shamansouri et al. (2016) reported that 68 out of 120 S. epidermidis isolates were methicillin-resistant, similar to our findings (16). Among the 100 S. epidermidis isolates of the present study, the highest percentage of specimens were found in urine (35%) and blood samples (25% Furthermore, an iodometric test showed that all of the isolates were β-lactamase producers and, moreover, PCR analysis confirmed the presence of blaZ in all isolates. Although the antibiotic resistance pattern was similar to our findings, the results of blaZ, however, differed (21). The propagation of resistant isolates to various β-lactam antibiotics is on the rise. Therefore, the therapy of infections related to S. epidermidis infections requires a definite and accurate diagnosis. Ultimately, we can prevent the unnecessary use of prescribed antibiotics by developing rapid, and more accurate treatments.